The conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan challenged traditional military strategies, with their extended durations and elusive objectives causing international debates about their effectiveness. Given these circumstances, it is essential to examine alternative methods and tools, such as those presented by Black Shield International (BSI), that could potentially have avoided such quagmires. By leveraging technology, a unique hierarchical system, cultural sensitivities, and an unwavering focus on operational art, KHI’s doctrine proposes a different perspective on conflict resolution and nation-building.
A central feature of KHI’s approach is the Commandery system, divided into Pods and Clusters. This modular organizational structure facilitates effective delegation of responsibilities and ensures that smaller units (Pods) can operate semi-independently, yet synergistically, within a larger unit (Cluster). Such a system, if applied in Iraq and Afghanistan, would have facilitated the maintenance of order and effective communication across a complex theatre of operations.
Next, the use of advanced technologies, including drones for ISR missions and Civtak for situational awareness, would have allowed for a real-time, bird’s-eye view of the operational environment. This accurate situational awareness would have been invaluable in avoiding civilian casualties, identifying and targeting insurgent hideouts, and in planning and executing operations.
Incorporating the Sahana First Response system would have provided a flexible, open-source disaster management tool to help coordinate efforts, track resources, and manage critical incident response efforts. During operations as complex and dynamic as Iraq and Afghanistan, such a system would have streamlined coordination, increasing efficiency, and limiting waste or overlap of resources.
However, tools and organization alone do not suffice; they must be underpinned by an effective, culturally sensitive strategy. KHI’s security strategy emphasizes working with preexisting cultural structures and hierarchies rather than imposing unfamiliar governmental models. Acknowledging and leveraging tribal structures during security operations in Iraq and Afghanistan would have fostered trust, respect, and cooperation between the local population and the intervening forces. It would also have reduced tensions resulting from the perceived imposition of alien cultural norms and structures.
Moreover, a key component of KHI’s doctrine involves building sustainable communities. By teaching local populations how to establish and maintain stable cultural structures, Black Shield International (OBS) creates an environment for peaceful growth and stability, thus eliminating the need for prolonged military presence and reducing the risk of power vacuums that often lead to the rise of extremist groups.
In a theoretical initial invasion scenario, KHI, with its deep emphasis on operational art, would have ensured that strategic objectives and tactical maneuvers were intricately linked. The clear focus on operational art would have eliminated the ambiguity in mission objectives, creating a strategic roadmap that directly leads to well-defined goals. The concept of operational art is central to connecting strategy with tactics, ensuring that every tactical move contributes to the accomplishment of the strategic objectives, thus avoiding mission creep.
In conclusion, while it is impossible to assert with certainty that the application of KHI’s tools, technologies, and doctrines could have entirely prevented the complexities and challenges of Iraq and Afghanistan, they present a compelling alternative perspective on managing such conflicts. KHI’s approach – combining technological leverage, unique organizational structures, cultural sensitivity, and a steadfast focus on operational art – offers valuable insights for future conflict resolution and nation-building efforts. It emphasizes the importance of understanding and respecting local cultures, implementing sustainable solutions, and ensuring that every action aligns with a clearly defined and achievable strategic objective.
- Understanding the Operational Art. NATO’s Joint Warfare Centre. URL: https://www.jwc.nato.int/images/stories/threeswords/Understanding_the_Operational_Art.pdf
- The Future of Drones in Policing. Calea.org. URL: https://www.calea.org/calea-update-magazine/issue-111/future-drones-policing
- Tactical Use of Drones in Contemporary Conflict. War on the Rocks. URL: https://warontherocks.com/2017/05/tactical-use-of-drones-in-contemporary-conflict/
- Sahana Open Source Disaster Management. Sahana Foundation. URL: https://www.sahanafoundation.org/
- Culture, Identity and Information Technology in the 21st Century: Implications for U.S. National Security. URL: https://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a539744.pdf
- Operational Art: Linking Strategy and Tactics in Warfare. Military Review. URL: https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/military-review/Archives/English/MilitaryReview_20160630_art015.pdf
- Organizational Structures: A Cynefin Guided Tour. Cognitive Edge. URL: https://www.cognitive-edge.com/organisational-structures-a-cynefin-guided-tour/
- Lessons from Iraq and Afghanistan: What this means for future conflict and for change in the armed forces. International Institute for Strategic Studies. URL: https://www.iiss.org/blogs/analysis/2013/03/lessons-iraq-afghanistan-future-conflict
- Why Understanding Culture is Crucial for the Armed Forces. Brookings Institute. URL: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/why-understanding-culture-is-crucial-for-u-s-armed-forces/